Within the abortion debate, one of the most pervasive tactics of the pro-abortion side has been to paint the unborn child in a dehumanizing manner. Consequently, the unborn child became a fetus [i], the embryo became a clump of cells, protoplasm, uterine content, etc. In addition, groups such as Planned Parenthood use the technology of ultrasound, not to show women a true picture of their unborn baby, but to deceive [ii] them into proceeding with a planned abortion. Deception and dissembling have been hallmarks of the abortion lobby from the very beginning. In fact, their tactics resemble those of a State or society which seeks to “dehumanize” its enemies [iii], i.e., especially in the time prior to and amid a war, political conflict, or social reconstruction [iv].
This has led to a considerable amount of confusion regarding the humanity of the unborn embryo or fetus. When does human life start? Is the fetus a human being? If not, when does it become one? These questions are all separate from the ones concerning person-hood, which is not the thrust of this article. In fact, the question of the beginning of human life and the time that life attains person-hood are two separate questions and must be addressed by different methods. Person-hood is a matter of belief, opinion, persuasion, subjectivity, etc., and is susceptible to a wide variety of influences—religious, philosophical, social, financial, etc.
There is only one qualified discipline which can state emphatically (and has hard evidence to back it up) when a new human life begins—embryonic science. This is strictly a scientific matter and science has clearly stated what so many believe or feel to be true.
“…scientifically something very radical occurs between the
processes of gametogenesis and fertilization, the change from a simple part of one
human being (i.e., a sperm) and a simple part of another human being
(i.e., an oocyte, usually
referred to as an “ovum” or “egg”), which simply possess
“human life”, to a new, genetically unique, newly existing,
individual, whole living human being (a single-cell embryonic human
zygote). That is, upon fertilization, parts of human beings have actually been
transformed into something very different from what they were before; they have
been changed into a single, whole human being. During the process of
fertilization, the sperm and the oocyte cease to exist as such, and a new human
being is produced.” –Dianne M. Irving, M.A., Ph.D [v]
In other words, what Dr. Irving has said is that when a sperm cell and an egg cell fuse (conception), a new, unique, individual human being has begun. The sperm and the egg were individual human cells before the fusion, after that, they are something completely different—a live human being which had never existed before. Of this, there can be no doubt. The life of every human begins at conception. This is unassailable, indisputable fact.
Dr. Irving goes on to explain (and goes into intense detail) why a human being comes into existence at conception. She lists and destroys several myths which have been promoted over the years and decades concerning this issue and never equivocates from the main premise–that a human being comes to life at the moment of conception.
“The issue is not when does human life begin, but rather
when does the life of every human being begin.”—Dianne M. Irving [vi]
From the moment of conception, a human being exists within the womb–zygote, blastocyst, embryo, fetus—right up to the point of the delivery as a newborn baby. At every stage of development, this is a live human being. Whether he is a person or not doesn’t matter. Whether she has rights or not is irrelevant. He is a human being. She is a human being. As such, abortion is a procedure which literally kills a human being. Abortion has probably killed hundreds of millions of human beings in the 20th century alone.
Every person who is alive today, every person who has ever
lived, started out in exactly the same way—as a newly conceived zygote with all
the genetic material necessary to become the persons we are today. We should be
grateful that our mothers didn’t simply decide to throw us away.
term “fetus” generates a lot of heat on both sides of the aisle. The pro-abortionists
use it almost exclusively and refuse to use the terms unborn baby or child for
obvious reasons. The pro-lifers prefer “baby” or “child” and generally avoid
using the term fetus, again for obvious reasons. Fetus, though, is simply a
Latin word which can have many meanings, however, all of them are related to
reproduction and refer to very young, immature offspring. It is medically
correct and refers to the stage of human development in the womb from embryo
(about 8 weeks) until birth. I do not generally make distinctions between
fetus, baby, and child, but use the terms interchangeably.
Nazi Germany, for instance, successfully used this tactic against the Jews. Today,
political parties attempt to divide the electorate into what are basically
[v] https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/wdhbb.html Dianne N. Irving, M.A., Ph.D (International
Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 1999, 19:3/4:22-36
Ibid. Section B, Fact 1.